State Ex Rel. Bronster v. United States Steel Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 552 does not require that defendants “be in the business of supplying information,” but only that “[t]hey ... profit by supplying the information”
• holding that where supporting materials for a motion to dismiss were not excluded by the trial court, a motion to dismiss may be treated as a motion for summary judgment
• recognizing that \pecuniary losses are recoverable in a claim for negligent misrepresentation\
• recognizing that “pecuniary losses are recoverable in a claim for negligent misrepresentation”
• recognizing that “pecuniary losses are recoverable in a claim for negligent misrepresentation”
• recognizing that “pecuniary losses are recoverable in a claim for negligent misrepresentation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).