William L. McCrae v. W.T. Hankins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that appellate court has duty to read plaintiff’s pro se response to motion for summary judgment liberally
• recognizing property interest in inmate accounts
• \Hewitt quite clearly did not require that an inmate facing disciplinary confinement be afforded the opportunity to present witnesses or evidence other than his own statement.\
• “Hewitt quite clearly did not require that an inmate facing disciplinary confinement be afforded the opportunity to present witnesses or evidence other than his own statement.”
• when a prisoner possesses personal property, “they enjoy a protected interest in that property that cannot be infringed without due process”
• when a prisoner possesses personal property, “they enjoy a protected interest in that property that cannot be infringed without due process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).