Earnest v. General Motors Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the class definition was so vague and broad, the minimum standard of definiteness was not met

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brooks v. Norwest Corp.
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-07-23· cited 42×
• In re Tri-State Crematory Litigation
  N.D. Georgia· 2003-03-17· cited 33×
• In re Polypropylene Carpet Antitrust Litigation
  N.D. Georgia· 1997-06-02· cited 30×
• Mack v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
  M.D. Alabama· 1996-12-10· cited 28×
• Campbell v. General Motors Corp.
  N.D. Alabama· 1998-09-08· cited 24×
• Clausnitzer v. Federal Express Corp.
  S.D. Florida· 2008-02-28· cited 18×
• Crawford v. American Bankers Insurance Co. of Florida
  M.D. Alabama· 1997-12-22· cited 13×
• Kelecseny v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc.
  S.D. Florida· 2009-11-25· cited 11×
• Perry v. Household Retail Services, Inc.
  M.D. Alabama· 1998-03-29· cited 11×
• Anderson v. Garner
  N.D. Georgia· 1997-09-11· cited 10×
• Loizon v. SMH Societe Suisse De Microelectronics, Et Horologerie SA
  N.D. Illinois· 1996-12-19· cited 9×
• McIntire v. Ford Motor Co.
  S.D. Ohio· 2001-03-06· cited 9×
• Morris v. Transouth Financial Corp.
  M.D. Alabama· 1997-11-14· cited 9×
• Rhodes v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.
  N.D. Georgia· 2003-03-07· cited 8×
• In re Terazosin Hydrochloride Antitrust Litigation
  S.D. Florida· 2001-09-20· cited 6×
• Moore v. Walter Coke, Inc.
  N.D. Alabama· 2013-09-30· cited 5×
• Line v. Astro Manufacturing Co.
  E.D. Kentucky· 1998-01-29· cited 4×
• Seale v. Home Cable Concepts, Inc. (In Re Best Reception Systems, Inc.)
  E.D. Tennessee· 1998-04-06· cited 3×
• Sher v. Raytheon Co.
  M.D. Florida· 2009-09-30· cited 1×

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission
  Supreme Court· 1977-06-20· cited 4,065×
• Snyder v. Harris
  Supreme Court· 1969-05-05· cited 955×
• Jacqueline Burns v. Windsor Insurance Co.
  Eleventh Circuit· 1994-09-13· cited 933×
• Barbara Allen v. R & H Oil & Gas Company, Farrar Oilfield Service and Equipment Co., and Tri-State Oil Services, Inc., Tri-State Oil Services, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1995-08-29· cited 700×
• Thomson v. Gaskill
  Supreme Court· 1942-03-02· cited 513×
• Carol L. Kirchner GAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
  Sixth Circuit· 1993-06-18· cited 504×
• Tapscott v. MS Dealer Service Corp.
  Eleventh Circuit· 1996-03-20· cited 477×
• Packard v. Banton
  Supreme Court· 1924-02-18· cited 306×
• 31 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1707, 32 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,668 Gloria Holmes v. Continental Can Company
  Eleventh Circuit· 1983-06-09· cited 231×
• Pinel v. Pinel
  Supreme Court· 1916-04-03· cited 182×
• Ruth Gilchrist, Cross-Appellee v. William Bolger, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Cross-Appellant
  Eleventh Circuit· 1984-06-11· cited 157×
• DeBremaecker v. Short
  Fifth Circuit· 1970-11-03· cited 103×
• Reserve National Insurance Co. v. Crowell Et Ux
  Supreme Court· 1993-10-04· cited 99×
• Maryland Cas. Co. v. Tiffin
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1988-12-02· cited 57×
• Cassell Carpenter v. Russell C. Davis, Mayor of Jackson
  Fifth Circuit· 1970-04-09· cited 52×
• EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D. H. HOLMES CO., LTD., Defendant-Appellee
  Fifth Circuit· 1977-07-29· cited 46×
• Reserve Nat. Ins. Co. v. Crowell
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1993-02-05· cited 22×
• Hardy v. United States Steel Corporation
  N.D. Alabama· 1967-08-02· cited 14×
• Justice v. Atchison, Topeka And Santa Fe Railway Company
  Tenth Circuit· 1991-02-28· cited 12×
• Hendrickson v. Philadelphia Gas Works
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1987-10-06· cited 12×

Other cases named Earnest v. General Motors Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Earnest v. General Motors Corp.
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1991-08-30