Duvall v. Charles Connell Roofing

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the “application of the unusual exertion rule produces arbitrary, inequitable and often ridiculous results” between employees with a pre-existing condition and without
• finding that under the usual exertion rule, “an injury is compensable if the ordinary stress and strain of employment is a substantial cause of the injury”
• “It is fundamental that the two primary purposes of the Delaware Workmen’s [sic] Compensation Law, 19 Del. C. Ch. 23 (1985

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).