Keeler v. Harford Mutual Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘‘In determining legislative intent in this case, we find it important to give effect to the whole statute, and leave no part superfluous.”
• \For Harford to step in after recovery and demand satisfaction of its lien without contributing to the effort or cost of recovery is patently unfair and at clear variance with the statutory mandate of apportionment.\
• \[i]t is irrelevant that the right of subrogation here is statutory\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).