· 7/2/1991
Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Lake
Citations
- 594 A.2d 38
- 1991 Del. LEXIS 236
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that in tort cases, the Delaware Supreme Court has adopted the most significant relationship test for choice of law
- holding that the Restatement’s most significant relationship test governs tort claims
- explaining that public policy exception to lex loci rule allows court to abandon application of another state’s law, when that law violates public policy of forum state
- holding that Delaware employs the “most significant relationship test”
- replacing lex loci delicti with the \most significant relationship\ test from the Second Restatement of Conflicts
- abandoning doctrine of lex loci delicti and adopting \most significant relationship\ test for resolving choice of law questions in tort actions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Christie, Horsey, Moore, Walsh, Hartnett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.