Histed v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that the rationale for this doctrine is that during an employee’s daily commute, they face the same risks as the general public
• employee injured during travel to work at 2:00 a.m., five hours before start of scheduled work shift, to respond to equipment breakdown which had halted plant operations
• “When factual determinations are at issue, we must take due account of the experience and specialized competence of the Board and of the purposes of our workers’ compensation law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).