N.D. California· 3/13/1991
Colaprico v. Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Citations
- 758 F. Supp. 1335
- 91 Daily Journal DAR 8368
- 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7335
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[M]otions to strike should not be granted unless it is clear that the matter to be stricken could have no possible bearing on the subject matter of the litigation.”
- “[M]otions to strike should not be granted unless it is clear that the matter to be stricken could have no possible bearing on the subject matter of the litigation.”
- “[M]otions to strike should not be granted unless it is clear that the matter to be stricken could have no possible bearing on the subject matter of the litigation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spencer Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Neilson v. Union Bank of California, N.A.C.D. California· 2003-10-20· cited 244×
- Platte Anchor Bolt, Inc. v. IHI, INC.N.D. California· 2004-04-19· cited 138×
- Bureerong v. UvawasC.D. California· 1996-03-21· cited 111×
- LeDuc v. Kentucky Central Life InsuranceN.D. California· 1992-08-31· cited 108×
- Neveu v. City of FresnoE.D. California· 2005-07-15· cited 83×
- RDF Media Ltd. v. Fox Broadcasting Co.C.D. California· 2005-05-10· cited 57×
- Gregory Village Partners, L.P. v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.N.D. California· 2011-08-02· cited 44×
- Wilkerson v. ButlerE.D. California· 2005-06-30· cited 41×
- In Re New CenturyC.D. California· 2008-12-03· cited 37×
- Lilley v. CharrenN.D. California· 1996-02-23· cited 33×
- Contreras v. Corinthian Vigor Insurance Brokerage, Inc.N.D. California· 1998-10-26· cited 23×
- Wilkins v. RamirezS.D. California· 2006-10-02· cited 22×
- Wang v. OCZ Technology Group, Inc.N.D. California· 2011-10-14· cited 18×
- Reniger v. Hyundai Motor AmericaN.D. California· 2015-08-18· cited 16×
- United States v. WangN.D. California· 2005-06-20· cited 14×
- Kellman v. Whole Foods Mkt., Inc.N.D. California· 2018-06-12· cited 14×
- Biggins v. Wells Fargo & Co.N.D. California· 2009-07-27· cited 13×
- Chaconas v. JP Morgan Chase BankS.D. California· 2010-05-10· cited 11×
- Wilson v. Playtika, Ltd.W.D. Washington· 2018-11-20· cited 10×
- San Diego Unified Port Dist. v. Monsanto Co.S.D. California· 2018-01-30· cited 9×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court· 1958-01-17· cited 586×
- Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-11-29· cited 448×
- Durning v. First Boston Corp.Ninth Circuit· 1987-04-27· cited 248×
- Alfus v. Pyramid Technology Corp.N.D. California· 1990-03-30· cited 47×
- Hawkins v. Oakland Title Insurance & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal· 1958-11-14· cited 38×
- In Re Worlds of Wonder Securities LitigationN.D. California· 1988-07-29· cited 37×
- Christiansen v. RoddyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-10-23· cited 35×
- Naton v. Bank of CaliforniaN.D. California· 1976-10-20· cited 13×
- In Re 3Com Securities LitigationN.D. California· 1990-05-07· cited 11×
- Levy v. EletrN.D. California· 1989-06-29· cited 4×
- In Re Wyse Technology Securities LitigationN.D. California· 1990-02-16· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.