Skip to main content
· 5/21/2009

In re Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) Antitrust Litigation

Citations

  • 257 F.R.D. 580
  • 2009 WL 1421460

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying a party’s request to take “trial depositions” after the close of discovery, and noting the refusal to distinguish between discovery and trial depositions “is the widely accepted view by federal courts throughout the country.” (citations omitted)
  • rejecting request to take trial depositions beyond the discovery period
  • rejecting request to take trial depositions beyond the discovery period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Master, Smith, Wilken

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.