· 5/21/2009
In re Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) Antitrust Litigation
Citations
- 257 F.R.D. 580
- 2009 WL 1421460
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying a party’s request to take “trial depositions” after the close of discovery, and noting the refusal to distinguish between discovery and trial depositions “is the widely accepted view by federal courts throughout the country.” (citations omitted)
- rejecting request to take trial depositions beyond the discovery period
- rejecting request to take trial depositions beyond the discovery period
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Master, Smith, Wilken
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.