Skip to main content

Durden v. State

Citations

  • 290 S.W.3d 413
  • 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 3341
  • 2009 WL 1347180

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding the trial evidence required a defensive instruction on mistake of fact
  • concluding the trial evidence required a defensive instruction on mistake of fact
  • concluding the trial evidence required a defensive instruction on mistake of fact
  • the charge from the court would have added “additional emphasis [on the defendant’s] sole defense to the charge
  • the charge from the court would have added “additional emphasis [on the defendant’s] sole defense to the charge
  • trial court erred in denying request for mistake in fact instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morriss, Carter, Moseley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.