Skip to main content

Sands v. State

Citations

  • 64 S.W.3d 488
  • 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 7609
  • 2001 WL 1402582

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a prior concurrence didn’t reflect a majority of the court when three justices would reach the same outcome but didn’t join the majority’s reasoning
  • concluding that a prior concurrence didn’t reflect a majority of the court when three justices would reach the same outcome but didn’t join the majority’s reasoning
  • defendant alleged mistake of fact because he thought syringe contained vitamin B-12 instead of methamphetamine when statute required intentional or knowing possession of methamphetamine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cornelius, Grant, Ross

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.