Skip to main content
· 9/7/2001

Dunn v. Gaiam, Inc.

Citations

  • 166 F. Supp. 2d 1273
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16023
  • 2001 WL 1181078

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no revival allowed — even though the new suit added five defendants and a cause of action under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”)— since “the case remains, at base, a contract action”
  • finding immaterial the addition of a new RICO claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Collins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.