S.D. Alabama· 11/6/2014
Tucker v. Equifirst Corp.
Citations
- 57 F. Supp. 3d 1347
- 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157166
- 2014 WL 5759070
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding the phrase “initial pleading” to be “unambiguous” because ‘initial’ by definition means ‘first...’ There cannot be multiple ‘first’ pleadings against a DMAIN □□□ defendant in a single civil action’
- “Intervenors may file notices of removal if they are properly aligned as defendants.” (quoting 14C CHARLES A. WRIGHT & ARTHUR R. MILLER, FEDERAL Practice and Procedure § 3730 (4th online ed. 2014))
- “Because the filing of an amended complaint is an act or event occurring between commencement and judgment, it is part of a single, ongoing civil action and cannot commence a new ‘civil action’ under Section 1446(b)(1).”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Steele
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court· 2002-06-10· cited 6,600×
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court· 1941-04-28· cited 2,267×
- Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc.Supreme Court· 1999-04-05· cited 2,082×
- Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. HensonSupreme Court· 2002-11-05· cited 1,396×
- National Ass'n of Home Builders v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 2007-06-25· cited 939×
- Andrew Pretka v. Kolter City Plaza II, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2010-06-08· cited 701×
- Lexecon Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & LerachSupreme Court· 1998-03-03· cited 670×
- Miller v. FrenchSupreme Court· 2000-06-19· cited 593×
- Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1898-01-10· cited 456×
- United States v. GrandersonSupreme Court· 1994-03-22· cited 311×
- United States v. KaleyEleventh Circuit· 2009-08-18· cited 268×
- Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority v. Citizens for the Abatement of Aircraft Noise, Inc.Supreme Court· 1991-06-17· cited 244×
- Adventure Outdoors, Inc. v. Michael BloombergEleventh Circuit· 2008-12-19· cited 241×
- Geoffrey Scimone v. Carnival CorporationEleventh Circuit· 2013-07-01· cited 182×
- BP America Production Co. Ex Rel. Amoco Production Co. v. BurtonSupreme Court· 2006-12-11· cited 179×
- Russell Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co.Eleventh Circuit· 2001-09-06· cited 160×
- Albert Williams v. Warden, Federal Bureau of PrisonEleventh Circuit· 2013-04-11· cited 138×
- Leslie Miedema v. Maytag CorporationEleventh Circuit· 2006-06-05· cited 124×
- Global Satellite Communication Co. v. Starmill U.K. Ltd.Eleventh Circuit· 2004-07-29· cited 108×
- David C. Wilson v. Intercollegiate (Big Ten) Conference Athletic Association, an Unincorporated AssociationSeventh Circuit· 1982-01-26· cited 97×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.