Skip to main content

Chapman v. State

Citations

  • 548 S.E.2d 278
  • 273 Ga. 865

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the trial court “did not err in finding that, considering the totality of the circumstances, Chapman knowingly and voluntarily waived his rights,” but saying that a “court is to consider” the nine Riley factors and listing the factors
  • upholding trial court’s admission of juvenile statement where there was no evidence that the interrogations were abusive or overly long
  • holding a trial court has no discretion to impose any further limit on the time for closing argument than that provided by statute, and failure to afford the parties two hours for argument in a capital case, even if the death penalty was not sought, is error as a matter of law
  • holding a trial court has no discretion to impose any further limit on the time for closing argument than that provided by statute, and failure to afford the parties two hours for argument in a capital case, even if the death penalty was not sought, is error as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hines

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.