District of Columbia· 3/27/2007

DSMC, INC. v. Convera Corp.

Citations

479 F. Supp. 2d 68
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21679
2007 WL 902034

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that database schema are protected under copyright law
rejecting “[plaintiffs] attempts to amend its complaint through its opposition to [defendant’s] motion for summary judgment.”
rejecting plaintiff’s attempts to broaden claims and thereby amend the complaint through plaintiff’s opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment
rejecting the plaintiff’s attempt to broaden claims and thereby amend its complaint in opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment
rejecting plaintiff’s attempts to broaden its conspiracy claims in its opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment because plaintiff failed to amend its complaint
rejecting a plaintiff's attempts to broaden claims and thereby amend the complaint through the plaintiff's opposition to the defendant's motion for summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named DSMC, INC. v. Convera Corp.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.