Imax Corporation v. Cinema Technologies, Inc. Neil Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming district court's discovery sanction against plaintiff for its failure to adequately identify trade secret during discovery
• Plaintiffs must “clearly refer to tangible trade secret material” instead of referring to a “system which potentially qualifies for trade secret protection.”
• “CTI could not be expected to prepare its rebuttal to Imax’s trade secrets claim without some concrete identification of exactly which ‘dimensions and tolerances’ Imax alleged were incorporated into CTI’s own projector system.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).