Hamandi v. Chertoff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that jurisdiction is proper over an unreasonable delay claim even when the applicable statute “does not specify a timeframe for action”
• noting that \the determination of whether an agency's delay is unreasonable is a fact specific inquiry\
• noting that “the determination of whether an agency’s delay is unreasonable is a fact specific inquiry”
• “While the court has jurisdiction over USCIS, the determination of whether an agency’s delay is unreasonable is a fact specific inquiry that is premature at this stage of the proceedings.”
• “While the court has jurisdiction over USCIS, the determination of whether an agency’s delay is unreasonable is a fact specific inquiry that is premature at this stage of the proceedings.”
• “While the court has jurisdiction over USCIS, the determination of whether an agency’s delay is unreasonable is a fact specific inquiry that is premature at this stage of the proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).