Skip to main content
· 8/5/1996

Mitek Holdings, Incorporated, Mitek Industries, Incorporated v. Arce Engineering Company, Incorporated

Citations

  • 89 F.3d 1548
  • 39 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1609
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 19230
  • 1996 WL 405838

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • protecting “ ‘nonliteral’ elements, such as the program architecture, structure, sequence, organization and computer-user interface”
  • “After submitting a specification of the elements that it deemed to be protectable, [a plaintiff] cannot now argue that the district court failed to abstract further the elements of its own designation of protectable features.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birch, Carnes, Simons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.