DSE, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ALJ was “responsible for resolving conflicts” and “internal 27 inconsistencies” in medical reports
• stating that when an ALJ finds a claimant's testimony unreliable, the 26 ALJ “must specifically identify what testimony is credible and what testimony undermines the 27 claimant's complaints.”
• finding that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) “does not prevent all prisoners from 26 accessing the courts; it only precludes prisoners with a history of abusing the legal system from 27 continuing to abuse it while enjoying IFP status”
• “Under the APA, we will not set aside agency action unless the party asserting error can demonstrate prejudice from the error” (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted)
• letter of intent not binding when completion of due diligence was contingency, among other conditions to be met, and letter expressly stated that parties were not bound
• “Under the APA, we will not set aside agency action unless the party asserting error can demonstrate prejudice from the error” (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).