Simms v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Here, there is no alleged ‘supervision’ in the negligent supervision claim. Masi was not employed by the defendant. Therefore, it is impossible for defendant to have ‘failed to adequately supervise the employee.’ . . . For that reason, plaintiff’s negligent supervision claim must fail.”
• internal 2 Because Erie has brought this suit based on diversity of citizenship under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, the Court is required to apply the substantive tort law of the District of Columbia. See Smith v. Wash. Sheraton Corp., 135 F.3d 779, 782 (D.C. Cir. 1998

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).