United States v. Haynes, Marcus E.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a three-page \Memorandum Opinion & Order\ containing the district court's reasoning and case citations failed to comply with the separate document requirement
• holding that a three-page “Memorandum Opinion & Order” containing the district court’s reasoning and case citations failed to comply with the separate document requirement
• concluding that an appeal was not time-barred under Rule 58 and citing Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 302-03, 113 S.Ct. 2625, 125 L.Ed.2d 239 (1993
• “The sole purpose of Rule 58’s separate document requirement was to clarify when the time for an appeal begins to run.”
• “The sole purpose of Rule 58’s separate document requirement was to clarify when the time for an appeal begins to run.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Robert Franklin v. District of Columbia
  D.C. Circuit· 1999-03-22· cited 101×
• DSE, Inc. v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1999-03-12· cited 78×
• Summers, Frank v. Howard University
  D.C. Circuit· 2004-07-16· cited 64×
• Outlaw v. Airtech Air Conditioning & Heating, Inc.
  D.C. Circuit· 2005-06-24· cited 43×
• Local Union No. 1992 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, in No. 02-4428 v. The Okonite Company, in Nos. 02-4352 & 03-1555
  Third Circuit· 2004-01-27· cited 35×
• United States v. Johnson, Robert
  D.C. Circuit· 2001-07-13· cited 22×
• Abdulwali v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
  D.C. Circuit· 2003-01-14· cited 17×
• White v. Fair
  First Circuit· 2002-03-28· cited 17×
• Bailey, Vanessa v. Potter, John E.
  D.C. Circuit· 2007-03-09· cited 12×
• Franklin, Robert v. DC
  D.C. Circuit· 1998-12-29
• Local 1992 v. Okonite Co
  Third Circuit· 2004-01-26

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 4,657×
• Shalala v. Schaefer
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-24· cited 4,378×
• Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.
  Supreme Court· 1978-02-21· cited 3,383×
• Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
  Supreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 1,703×
• Bankers Trust Co. v. Mallis
  Supreme Court· 1978-05-15· cited 904×
• United States v. Indrelunas
  Supreme Court· 1973-04-16· cited 320×
• Allan G. Charles v. Richard M. Daley, State's Attorney, and Eugene F. Diamond, Intervening
  Seventh Circuit· 1986-12-01· cited 233×
• Richard C. Fiore v. Washington County Community Mental Health Center
  First Circuit· 1992-03-30· cited 94×
• Andre C. Derrington-Bey v. District of Columbia Department of Corrections
  D.C. Circuit· 1995-01-17· cited 69×
• Ellison v. Conoco, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1992-01-24· cited 46×
• Daniel Diamond, by His Mother Justine Diamond v. Floretta McKenzie
  D.C. Circuit· 1985-08-20· cited 38×
• Barbara W. Wikoff, Individually and as of the Estate of John W. Wikoff v. John Vanderveld, Jr.
  Seventh Circuit· 1990-05-09· cited 34×
• Jerry Baker, Jerry Baker v. Mercedes Benz of North America Daimler Benz Ag
  Fifth Circuit· 1997-05-21· cited 25×
• United States v. Patsy Ann Hodges
  Eighth Circuit· 1993-07-15· cited 20×
• Pack v. Burns International Security Service
  D.C. Circuit· 1997-12-09· cited 15×
• Becky Chambers v. American Trans Air, Incorporated
  Seventh Circuit· 1993-03-31· cited 6×