Jasperson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a direct civil action . . . rather than a habeas petition, is [an] appropriate vehicle for challenging” confinement in a correctional facility versus a community confinement center
• noting BOP’s argument that a challenge to the RRC Placement Rule “could be brought ... as a habeas petition”
• finding APA claim cognizable under 18 U.S.C. § 3625 where Plaintiff “challenges the rulemaking leading to the BOP policy that informed his confinement determination, rather than challenging the determination itself”
• “BOP’s placement decision itself is not open to challenge” under 18 U.S.C. § 3625 even if a challenge to agency rule-making leading to the BOP policy informing a particular decision is a cognizable claim under the APA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).