Skip to main content
· 1/24/2005

Carolina Marine Handling, Inc. v. Lasch

Citations

  • 609 S.E.2d 548
  • 363 S.C. 169
  • 2005 S.C. App. LEXIS 15

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a standard attestation clause was not sufficient to create a sealed instrument
  • refusing to construe a boilerplate attestation clause, by itself, as evidence of intent to create a sealed instrument because it would “transform the twenty-year statute of limitations into a standard period of limitations for contract actions in this state.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kittredge, Huff, Beatty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.