Hunting v. Elders

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming district court’s decision to pierce corporate veil based on its finding that the defendant knew of the plaintiff’s claim against the entity and acted in a self-serving and unfair manner by, inter alia, siphoning funds and transferring stocks from the entity
• “[I]t is recognized that a corporation is an entity, separate and distinct from its officers and stockholders . . . .”
• finding corporations are separate entities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).