Skip to main content
Court of Claims· 2/21/1979

Dravo Corp. v. United States

Citations

  • 219 Ct. Cl. 416
  • 594 F.2d 842
  • 25 Cont. Cas. Fed. 82,542
  • 1979 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 62

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “ ‘clear necessity for borrowings occasioned by the change’ must be proven by the contractor”
  • finding that \`clear necessity for borrowings occasioned by the change' must be proven by the contractor\
  • “direct tracing to a specific loan or necessity for increased borrowing is still required to be proven in order for a contractor to recover for interest costs under an equitable adjustment theory.”
  • “[I]t is clear that this court still holds to the view that direct tracing to a specific loan or necessity for increased borrowing is still required to be proven in order for a contractor to recover for interest costs under an equitable adjustment theory.”
  • “[I]t is clear that this court still holds to the view that direct tracing to a specific loan or necessity for increased borrowing is still required to be proven in order for a contractor to recover for interest costs under an equitable adjustment theory.”
  • “[I]t is clear that this court still holds to the view that direct tracing to a specific loan or necessity for increased borrowing is still required to be proven in order for a contractor to recover for interest costs under an equitable adjustment theory.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Kashiwa, Kunzig, Pee, Trial, Yock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Dravo Corp. v. United States

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.