Gevyn Construction Corp. v. The United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that interest on bank borrowings for changed work would be permissible either if it was directly traced to a specific loan or a necessity for increased borrowing is shown to have been required by extra work or delay caused by the government
• “[28 U.S.C. §] 2516(a) does not bar an interest award as part of an equitable adjustment under a fixed-price contract if the contractor has actually paid interest because of the government’s delay in payment”
• “[28 U.S.C. §] 2516(a) does not bar an interest award as part of an equitable adjustment under a fixed- price contract if the contractor has actually paid interest because of the government’s delay in payment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).