Tatelbaum ex rel. Creditors of A. Hoen & Co. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[m]uch the same evidence is relevant to each determination,” and listing the same factors as necessary to determine “whether either of these exceptions applies”
• stating that “[m]uch the same evidence is relevant to each determination,” and listing the same factors as necessary to determine “whether either of these exceptions applies”
• recognizing the summary judgment standard is needed given “a decision on a Rule 25(c) motion [at that stage of the suit] effectively imposes liability” on the substituted party
• quoting 7C Wright, Miller & Kane, Federal Civil Procedure § 1958 at 555 (2d ed. 1986
• comparing Rule 25(c) with Rule 56 which does specify a standard
• whether stock was part of the purchase price for the predecessor’s assets is only one factor to be considered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).