Drake v. Filko

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a regulation requiring individuals seeking a permit to carry a handgun in public was longstanding and presumptively lawful, and that it withstands intermediate scrutiny
• holding “the requirement that applicants demonstrate a 'justifiable need’ to publicly carry a handgun for self-defense qualifies as a 'presumptively lawful,’ 'longstanding' regulation and therefore does not burden conduct within the scope of the Second Amendment’s guarantee”
• New Jersey “justifiable need” restriction on carrying handguns in public “does not burden conduct within the scope of the Second Amendment’s guarantee”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).