Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 12/14/2016

Jeff Silvester v. Kamala Harris

Citations

  • 843 F.3d 816
  • 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 22184
  • 2016 WL 7228824

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a statute imposing a ten-day waiting period to purchase firearms on certain individuals was reasonably fit to state’s public safety objective
  • noting that “[t]here is … nothing new in having to wait for the delivery of a weapon” and upholding 10-day waiting period
  • noting that “[t]here is … nothing new in having to wait for the delivery of a weapon” and upholding 10-day waiting period
  • upholding a 10-day waiting period for purchasers who already had a concealed-carry permit and already cleared a background check
  • upholding a ten-day waiting period on the sale of firearms to those who already own one
  • upholding a 10-day waiting period for purchasers who already had a concealed-carry permit and already cleared a background check

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas, Schroeder, Nguyen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Jeff Silvester v. Kamala Harris

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.