Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 8/3/2018

Ivan Pena v. Stephen Lindley

Citations

  • 898 F.3d 969

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding a firearm-safety restriction because of the deference we owe to “[t]he legislative judgment that preventing cases of accidental discharge outweighs the need for discharging a gun” in the “rare instance” where the safety restriction “disables a gun capable of providing self- defense”
  • “Our circuit similarly has strained to interpret the phrase ‘conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.’”
  • assuming without deciding that firearm regulations implicate the core right

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

70 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.