First Circuit· 8/12/2005
Doyle v. Huntress, Inc.
Citations
- 419 F.3d 3
- 2005 A.M.C. 2127
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 16905
- 2005 WL 1926227
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Another significant factor that we must consider in our construction of this statute is the presumption in favor of seamen”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Torruella, Lynch, Lipez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Francisco Sanchez v. Esso Standard Oil Co.First Circuit· 2009-06-19· cited 446×
- Siaca v. DCC Operating, Inc.First Circuit· 2007-01-17· cited 111×
- Ruiz-Rosa v. Rivera-GonzalezFirst Circuit· 2007-04-24· cited 107×
- Block Island Fishing, Inc. v. RogersFirst Circuit· 2016-12-23· cited 81×
- Lyman v. BakerFirst Circuit· 2020-03-31· cited 78×
- United States v. RobersonFirst Circuit· 2006-08-11· cited 66×
- Puerto Rico Ports Authority v. Barge Katy-B, O.N. 606665First Circuit· 2005-10-25· cited 28×
- Fideicomiso De La Tierra v. FortunoFirst Circuit· 2010-04-28· cited 24×
- Massachusetts v. Mylan LaboratoriesD. Massachusetts· 2008-12-23· cited 15×
- Global Naps, Inc. v. Massachusetts Department Of Telecommunications And EnergyFirst Circuit· 2005-10-18· cited 11×
- Peña v. FortuñoFirst Circuit· 2010-04-28· cited 10×
- L. M. v. Town of Middleborough, MassachusettsFirst Circuit· 2024-06-09· cited 8×
- Great Lakes Insurance SE v. AnderssonFirst Circuit· 2023-04-19· cited 7×
- Doyle v. Huntress, Inc.First Circuit· 2008-01-25· cited 6×
- Vaqueria Tres Monjitas, Inc. v. Indulac, Inc.First Circuit· 2014-12-02· cited 6×
- Global NAPs, Inc. v. Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications & EnergyFirst Circuit· 2005-10-18· cited 3×
- Wagenmaker v. Amica Mutual InsuranceD. Rhode Island· 2009-03-03· cited 2×
- Doyle v. Huntress, Inc.D. Rhode Island· 2007-02-20· cited 2×
- Michael Mcpherson v. Fishing Company Of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2017-05-30· cited 2×
- Eileen Leahy v. P Omni Hotels Management Corporation, et al.D. New Hampshire· 2021-08-13· cited 1×
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court· 2004-01-26· cited 1,956×
- Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court· 2000-05-30· cited 1,290×
- Dodd v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2005-06-20· cited 587×
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court· 1957-04-29· cited 584×
- McMahon v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1951-11-05· cited 348×
- Conroy v. AniskoffSupreme Court· 1993-03-31· cited 333×
- Muniz v. HoffmanSupreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 321×
- Isbrandtsen Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1952-06-09· cited 304×
- Koons Buick Pontiac GMC, Inc. v. NighSupreme Court· 2004-11-30· cited 243×
- Carbo v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1961-01-09· cited 228×
- Warner v. GoltraSupreme Court· 1934-11-05· cited 204×
- Tidewater Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 133×
- Martha's Vineyard Scuba Headquarters, Inc. v. The Unidentified, Wrecked and Abandoned Steam Vessel, Etc.First Circuit· 1987-11-24· cited 102×
- Kevin Wingerter v. Chester Quarry CompanySeventh Circuit· 1999-07-23· cited 68×
- United States v. SischoSupreme Court· 1923-05-07· cited 57×
- Strickland v. Commissioner, Maine Department of Human ServicesFirst Circuit· 1996-09-24· cited 54×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1998-05-11· cited 50×
- United States v. Pedro RiveraFirst Circuit· 1997-12-02· cited 35×
- Rich v. WilliamsFirst Circuit· 1899-10-27· cited 29×
- Florio v. OlsonFirst Circuit· 1997-11-25· cited 21×
Other cases named Doyle v. Huntress, Inc.
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.