Skip to main content
· 8/12/2005

Doyle v. Huntress, Inc.

Citations

  • 419 F.3d 3
  • 2005 A.M.C. 2127
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 16905
  • 2005 WL 1926227

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Another significant factor that we must consider in our construction of this statute is the presumption in favor of seamen”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Lynch, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.