Muniz v. Hoffman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, under an arbitration clause which read, “any controversy . . . arising under this Agreement,” no “provision of the contract [was] wholly outside of the arbitration provision”
• finding that prior ruling does not relieve a district court of its obligation to present the Court of Appeals with what it believes to be a correct judgment
• court deemed issue inappropriate for review because of absence of legal authorities cited in support of conclusory argument and lack of factual basis in record
• court deemed issue inappropriate for review because of absence of legal authorities cited in support of conclusory argument and lack of factual basis in record
• \In the absence of language withdrawing this provision [for correcting gross inequities] from the arbitration requirement it is the duty of the court to resolve any doubts in favor of arbitration.\
• remand proper where district court fails to consider Kerr factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).