· 12/2/2014
Vaqueria Tres Monjitas, Inc. v. Indulac, Inc.
Citations
- 772 F.3d 956
- 90 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 421
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 22651
- 2014 WL 6765769
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the district court’s order, which contained five numbered provisions that disposed of claims but did not provide legal analysis or engage with the parties’ issues, satisfied Rule 58
- concluding a motion for reconsideration filed twenty-nine days after entry of judgment, like here, is untimely
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Torruella, Lipez, Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.