Skip to main content
· 12/2/2014

Vaqueria Tres Monjitas, Inc. v. Indulac, Inc.

Citations

  • 772 F.3d 956
  • 90 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 421
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 22651
  • 2014 WL 6765769

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court’s order, which contained five numbered provisions that disposed of claims but did not provide legal analysis or engage with the parties’ issues, satisfied Rule 58
  • concluding a motion for reconsideration filed twenty-nine days after entry of judgment, like here, is untimely

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Lipez, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.