Skip to main content
N.D. Texas· 10/24/2012

Douglass v. Beakley

Citations

  • 900 F. Supp. 2d 736
  • 2012 WL 5250566
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152765

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that fact dispute could not be resolved at the Rule 12(b)(6) stage and instead required “an examination of, at a minimum, summary judgment evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.