Skip to main content
· 4/29/2004

Martin K. Eby Construction Company, Inc. v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit

Citations

  • 369 F.3d 464
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 8539
  • 2004 WL 911796

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that, under Texas law, governmental immunity embraces two principles: immunity from liability and immunity -from suit
  • addressing a 12(b)(6) motion for dismissal for untimely filing of a complaint
  • in reviewing a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, a court “accepts all well-pleaded facts as true, viewing them in the light most favorable to the plaintiff.”
  • “When a district court dismisses a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, the dismissal is without prejudice to the claimant’s right to return to court after it has exhausted its administrative remedies.”
  • “When a district court dismisses a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, the dismissal is without prejudice to the claimant's right to return to court after it has exhausted its administrative remedies.”
  • “When a district court dismisses a claim . . . for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, the dismissal is without prejudice to the claimant’s right to return to court after it has exhausted its administrative remedies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Benavides, Clement

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.