NationsBank, N.A. v. Dilling

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the bank could not be vicariously liable because plaintiff had no proof that the bank knowingly permitted the third party to hold itself out as having the bank’s authority to give investment advice
• stating that a principal may be vicariously liable for the fraudulent conduct of its agent if the agent acted with actual or apparent authority
• stating that a principal may be vicariously liable for the fraudulent conduct of its agent if the agent acted with actual or apparent authority
• stating that a principal may be vicariously liable for the fraudulent conduct of its agent if the agent acted with actual or apparent authority
• recognizing the injury suffered must be a foreseeable result of the negligent hiring
• recognizing the injury suffered must be a foreseeable result of the negligent hiring

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).