Southwestern Bell Telephone, LP v. City of Houston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that § 1983\provides a remedy for the violation ... of rights secured under the Constitution and laws of the United States\ (quoting Kirchberg v. Feenstra , 708 F.2d 991 , 1000 (5th Cir. 1983) )
• finding ordinance imposing relocation costs on Ielecommunications owners to be “competitively neutral and nondiscriminatory”
• “[W]hen deciding, under Rule 12(b)(6), whether to dismiss for failure to state a claim, the court considers, of course, only the allegations in the complaint.”
• “[W]hen deciding, under Rule 12(b)(6), whether to dismiss for failure to state a claim, the court considers, of course, only the allegations in the complaint.”
• “[W]hen deciding, under Rule 12(b)(6), whether to dismiss for failure to state a claim, the court considers, of course, only the allegations in the complaint.”
• “[W]hen deciding, under Rule 12(b)(6), whether to dismiss for failure to state a claim, the court considers, of course, only the allegations in the complaint.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).