Skip to main content

Douglas v. State

Citations

  • 634 N.E.2d 811
  • 1994 WL 226994

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that if there is no reversible error, then the prejudice prong of ineffective assistance of counsel is not met
  • observing that no previous case considered delay between filing date and hearing, and declining to penalize petitioner for public defender's postfiling delay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barteau, Baker, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.