Skip to main content

Perry v. State

Citations

  • 512 N.E.2d 841
  • 1987 Ind. LEXIS 1044

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering laches in the context of a prisoner seeking post-conviction relief and finding that both constructive knowledge and “inquiry notice alone [are] not sufficient to support a finding of unreasonable delay under circumstances permitting diligence”
  • distinguishing the insufficient “notice which is imputed from the mere passage of time in post-conviction proceedings” from the sufficient “[i]nquiry notice which is imputed from objective facts, such as the open and notorious use of land by an adverse claimant”
  • repeated contact with the criminal justice system, consulting with attorneys, and incarceration in institutions with legal facilities
  • repeated contact with the criminal justice system, consulting with attorneys, and incarceration in institutions with legal facilities
  • plea of guilty on misdemeanor and resultant fine is insufficient, standing alone, to prove defendant was on notice as to the validity of his plea and conviction
  • plea of guilty on misdemean- or and resultant fine is insufficient, standing alone, to prove defendant was on notice as to the validity of his plea and conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepard, Debruler, Dickson, Givan, Pivarnik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.