Skip to main content

Dougherty v. State

Citations

  • 785 So. 2d 1221
  • 2001 WL 527684

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that resentencing defendant in absentia and without holding hearing amounts to fundamental error when resen- tencing requires more than ministerial act
  • holding that a defendant has a right to be present at sentencing, whether the sentence to be \imposed\ results from adjudication of guilt or from a successful rule 3.850 motion
  • stating a defendant is entitled to be present at sentencing, except in “re-sentencing cases where all that is required on remand is a ministerial act of sentence correction”
  • \The imposition of a sentence is a crucial stage at which the defendant is entitled to be present. An exception is made in resentencing cases where all that is required on remand is a ministerial act of sentence correction.\
  • “The imposition of a sentence is a crucial stage at which the defendant is entitled to be present. An exception is made in resentencing cases where all that is required on remand is a ministerial act of sentence correction.”
  • “The imposition of a sentence is a crucial stage at which the defendant is entitled to be present. . . . An exception is made in resentencing cases where all that is required on remand is a ministerial act of sentence correction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.