District Court of Appeal of Florida· 6/20/2001
Ingram v. State
Citations
- 789 So. 2d 430
- 2001 WL 686378
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that where defendant’s original sentence was above sentence that could be imposed without departure under 1994 guidelines, resentencing that involved more than ministerial act was required
- indigent defendant has right to court-appointed counsel
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Heggs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-02-17· cited 853×
- Trapp v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-06-01· cited 249×
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-10-06· cited 63×
- Bortel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-09-29· cited 33×
- Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1987-12-10· cited 28×
- Dougherty v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-05-16· cited 21×
- Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-06-16· cited 7×
- Burks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-06-20· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.