Rivers v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Our review of the record shows that the resentencing proceeding in this case was not purely ministerial and that Rivers was entitled to be present at the hearing.”
• “Our review of the record shows that the resentencing proceeding in this case was not purely ministerial and that Rivers was entitled to be present at the hearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Walton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-02-12· cited 63×
• Acosta v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-11-05· cited 9×
• DONNIS T. FOSTER v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-04-03
• Christopher March Renick v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-04-17
• Christopher March Renick v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-06-27

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dougherty v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-05-16· cited 21×
• Orta v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-01-18· cited 20×
• Olsen v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-01· cited 7×
• Perez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-12-03· cited 3×
• Drayton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-11-17· cited 3×