Skip to main content

Orta v. State

Citations

  • 919 So. 2d 602
  • 2006 WL 120005

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant is not constitutionally entitled to be present at resentencing where the resentencing is only a ministerial act to correct a prior sentence
  • concluding that resentencing on a recalculated scoresheet is not a “ministerial act,” and, thus, the defendant had the right to be present
  • holding that a defendant is not constitutionally entitled to be present at resentencing where the resentencing is only a ministerial act to correct a prior sentence
  • holding that any error in denying a defendant her or his right to be present at a critical stage or any proceeding is fundamental error, except in resentencing cases where only the “ministerial act” of sentence correction is required
  • “Although the trial court originally pronounced its intention to sentence the defendant to ‘the bottom of the guidelines,’ it was not obligated to do so.”
  • “Although the trial court originally pronounced its intention to sentence the defendant to ‘the bottom of the guidelines,’ it was not obligated to do so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Levy, Gersten, and Rothenberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.