Second Circuit· 2/6/1985
Donovan v. Bierwirth
Citations
- 754 F.2d 1049
- 78 A.L.R. Fed. 91
- 6 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1033
- 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 28995
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “[m]easuring damages involves the application of law to fact; the proper formula for calculating damages is essentially a question of law”
- finding ERISA requires a breaching fiduciary to restore a plan to the position it would have been in but for that fiduciary’s unlawful conduct
- “This is nothing more than application of the principle that, once a breach of trust is established, uncertainties in fixing damages will be resolved against the wrongdoer”
- remedy for breach of trust is to restore beneficiaries to position they would have been in had no breach occurred
- “The chief issue presented for our review concerns the applicable measure of damages.”
- “In such cases, it may well be that the best measure of damages is one that awards the plaintiff the difference between what was paid for the stock, and what would have been paid had the plaintiff been aware of the concealed information.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pierce
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
106 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Trustees of the Upstate New York Engineers Pension Fund v. Ivy Asset ManagementSecond Circuit· 2016-12-08· cited 353×
- Sacerdote v. New York UniversitySecond Circuit· 2021-08-16· cited 299×
- Coyne & Delany Co. v. SelmanFourth Circuit· 1996-10-25· cited 184×
- Martin v. FeilenEighth Circuit· 1992-06-03· cited 174×
- Graden v. Conexant Systems Inc.Third Circuit· 2007-07-31· cited 161×
- In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISAS.D. Texas· 2003-10-16· cited 114×
- Brown v. Medtronic, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 2010-12-13· cited 112×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,906 Herbert J. Rowe, Cross-Appellants v. Maremont Corporation, Cross-AppelleeSeventh Circuit· 1988-08-04· cited 102×
- Leister v. Dovetail, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2008-10-23· cited 77×
- Meinhardt v. Unisys Corp.Third Circuit· 1999-03-22· cited 76×
- Unnamed caseSecond Circuit· 2002-08-20· cited 70×
- Taylor v. KeyCorpSixth Circuit· 2012-05-25· cited 64×
- Thomas Perez, Secretary v. Herbert BruisterFifth Circuit· 2016-05-03· cited 53×
- Liss v. SmithS.D. New York· 1998-01-13· cited 52×
- Kinek v. Paramount Communications, Inc.Second Circuit· 1994-04-28· cited 50×
- Gerald G. Roth Logan M. Ammon v. Sawyer-Cleator Lumber Company, Employee Stock Ownership Plan Charles J. Sawyer Clifford E. SawyerEighth Circuit· 1995-09-20· cited 47×
- Charles W. Leigh & Ervin F. Dusek, and Estate of George Johnson, Intervening Cross-Appellees v. Clyde William Engle, Cross-AppellantsSeventh Circuit· 1988-09-30· cited 43×
- Greenblatt v. Prescription Plan Services Corp.S.D. New York· 1992-03-23· cited 37×
- Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n, Inc. v. Arctic Exp., Inc.S.D. Ohio· 2003-10-22· cited 37×
- Reich v. Valley National Bank of ArizonaS.D. New York· 1993-09-10· cited 36×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.