· 5/25/2012
Taylor v. KeyCorp
Citations
- 680 F.3d 609
- 82 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1052
- 53 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2057
- 2012 WL 1889283
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 10613
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that once a notice of appeal is filed, a district court is without jurisdiction to address a motion to intervene
- finding that since plaintiff sold all of her units right after the beginning of the class period and did not repurchase any units — only acquiring some through a matching program which were subsequently sold— plaintiff suffered no loss as she earned a net profit
- analyzing forfeiture of an argument for jurisdiction
- adopting Tenth Circuit’s holding from Ramseyer
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Norris, Clay, Griffin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.