Skip to main content
· 5/25/2012

Taylor v. KeyCorp

Citations

  • 680 F.3d 609
  • 82 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1052
  • 53 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2057
  • 2012 WL 1889283
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 10613

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that once a notice of appeal is filed, a district court is without jurisdiction to address a motion to intervene
  • finding that since plaintiff sold all of her units right after the beginning of the class period and did not repurchase any units — only acquiring some through a matching program which were subsequently sold— plaintiff suffered no loss as she earned a net profit
  • analyzing forfeiture of an argument for jurisdiction
  • adopting Tenth Circuit’s holding from Ramseyer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Norris, Clay, Griffin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.