· 10/23/2008
Leister v. Dovetail, Inc.
Citations
- 546 F.3d 875
- 45 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1308
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 21982
- 2008 WL 4659364
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that there is a presumption that the district court “will relinquish [that] jurisdiction over any supplemental claim to the state courts”
- noting that although “the plan is the logical and normally the only proper defendant” in a suit for benefits, “in cases . . . in (continued...
- noting that “when the federal claim in a case drops out before trial,” a district court usually “relinquish[es] jurisdiction over any supplemental claim to the state courts.”
- noting that “when the federal claim in a case drops out before trial,” a district court usually “relinquish[es] jurisdiction over any supplemental claim to the state courts.”
- noting that “when the federal claim in a case drops out before trial,” a district court usually “relinquish[es] jurisdiction over any supplemental claim to the state courts.”
- noting that “when the federal claim in a case drops out before trial,” a district court usually “relinquish[es] jurisdiction over any supplemental claim to the state courts”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Posner, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.