Skip to main content
Idaho Supreme Court· 12/16/1999

Doe v. Roe

Citations

  • 992 P.2d 1205
  • 133 Idaho 805
  • 1999 Ida. LEXIS 135

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the best interests of the child standard applies in proceedings to terminate parental rights
  • holding the best interests of the child standard applies in proceedings to terminate parental rights
  • “There is no requirement that a party seeking termination present expert testimony to support the assertion that termination would be in the best interests of the child.”
  • “There is no requirement that a party seeking termination present expert testimony to support the assertion that termination would be in the best interests of the child.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Trout, Silak, Walters, Kidwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.