Idaho Supreme Court· 6/4/2003

Doe v. Doe

Citations

71 P.3d 1040
138 Idaho 893
2003 Ida. LEXIS 91

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that certain factual errors were harmless, even if the factual error was clear error
concluding that certain factual errors were harmless, even if they were clear error
determining that Doe’s failure to pay adequate child support contributed to willful abandonment
“parent may have a mental illness or deficiency and still be competent for purposes of the proceeding such that a guardian ad litem is not necessary”
“Even if a finding of fact is in .error, this Court should disregard such error unless it affects the substantial rights of the parties.”
“I.C. § 16-2005, which is clear and specific as to the intent necessary to show abandonment, supercedes the common law standard as set forth in Moss [v. Vest, 74 Idaho 328, 262 P.2d 116 (1953) ]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Trout, Walters, Kidwell, Eismann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.