In Re Doe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “past criminal behavior is certainly relevant” in the determination of whether to terminate parental rights
• past criminal behavior is relevant in 5 considering whether to terminate parental rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Doe
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2007-11-30· cited 306×
• Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. Doe
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2011-03-03· cited 25×
• Schneider v. Schneider
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2011-08-08· cited 17×
• Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. Doe
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2010-05-07· cited 5×
• Doe v. Doe
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2011-06-07· cited 4×
• Dorsey v. Dorsey
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2023-08-30· cited 4×
• Re Termination of Parental Rights (father)
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2011-03-03
• In the Matter of Termination of Parent-Child Relationship
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2010-05-07
• In the Matter of Jane Doe, a minor child, Health & Welfare v. Jane Doe I
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2010-03-30
• DHW v. John Doe
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2019-12-23

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Doe v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2002-08-13· cited 303×
• Dinneen v. Finch
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1979-11-28· cited 173×
• Doe v. Roe
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1999-12-16· cited 64×
• Donndelinger v. Donndelinger
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1984-10-29· cited 38×
• Dayley v. State, Department of Health & Welfare
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1987-02-27· cited 18×
• State, Department of Health & Welfare v. Roe
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2006-02-27· cited 5×