Idaho Court of Appeals· 1/17/1986
Thompson v. Thompson
Citations
- 714 P.2d 62
- 110 Idaho 93
- 1986 Ida. App. LEXIS 354
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing conflict among state courts as to whether de novo review is required and holding it is not
- discussing conflict among state courts as to whether de novo review is required and holding it is not
- discussing conflict among state courts as to whether de novo review is required and holding it is not
- rejecting argument that mother did not neglect child because she relied on the “generosity of others” who did care for the child
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burnett, Swanstrom, Walters
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Tanner v. State, Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court· 1991-09-19· cited 288×
- Re: Thermination of Parental Rights (mother)Idaho Supreme Court· 2014-03-18· cited 273×
- in the Interest of M.G.D. and B.L.DTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2003-05-29· cited 166×
- McCoy v. Hearst Corp.California Supreme Court· 1986-11-13· cited 65×
- Doe v. RoeIdaho Supreme Court· 1999-12-16· cited 64×
- In Interest of BushIdaho Supreme Court· 1988-01-28· cited 42×
- Roe v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court· 2005-11-23· cited 32×
- Hofmeister v. BauerIdaho Court of Appeals· 1986-05-30· cited 18×
- Dayley v. State, Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court· 1987-02-27· cited 18×
- In Re DayleyIdaho Supreme Court· 1987-02-27· cited 13×
- Doe II v. Doe IIdaho Supreme Court· 2017-09-22· cited 10×
- Department of Health & Welfare v. DoeIdaho Court of Appeals· 1999-12-23· cited 6×
- In Re MGDTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2003-05-29
- Jane Doe and John Doe 1 v. John DoeIdaho Court of Appeals· 2024-08-26
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-04-30· cited 2,137×
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 1,335×
- In the Interest of J.R.H.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1984-11-14· cited 97×
- Rasmussen v. MartinIdaho Court of Appeals· 1983-02-22· cited 95×
- In Interest of Baby Girl K.Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1983-07-01· cited 70×
- In Re Donna W.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-02-10· cited 59×
- Jensen v. BledsoeIdaho Supreme Court· 1979-04-17· cited 45×
- Thompson v. Arkansas Social ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1984-05-07· cited 41×
- Bedal v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court· 1923-07-05· cited 41×
- NADA A. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1983-02-25· cited 37×
- In Re Daniel C.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1984-08-03· cited 35×
- Woodruff v. KealeHawaii Supreme Court· 1981-12-09· cited 31×
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-4374Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-07-28· cited 30×
- In re T.C.M.Missouri Court of Appeals· 1983-03-15· cited 26×
- In re Juvenile Appeal (85-3)Connecticut Appellate Court· 1985-01-22· cited 19×
- Rhodes v. State, Dept. of Health and WelfareIdaho Supreme Court· 1985-02-13· cited 18×
- Custody of a Minor (No. 1)Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1984-03-29· cited 18×
- In the Matter of MatthewsIdaho Supreme Court· 1975-09-08· cited 17×
- Castro v. State, Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court· 1981-05-22· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.